Thank you for getting in touch with me, and for not bothering our VP and President and CIO after I didn’t initially respond to you voice mail or email request to talk about the latest features that your LMS has to offer. In the six years I’ve been in this job, I’ve had the opportunity to speak with many of you, both in person and via other means. I admire the enthusiasm and patience you have in a role where I personally would struggle, especially when trying to get people like me excited about your latest offerings. I suspect it must be very deflating to talk to people like me, and I always feel bad if I feel like I’ve wasted your time. This is actually the inspiration for this letter…
The first thing you need to know about us (JIBC) is that we are not your typical university or even college for that matter. We are a publicly funded institute focused on training and educating people in public safety fields. As an institute this means we offer everything from short certificates to degrees and post grad certificates. However this also means that a big part of our education is short courses – intensive 2 or 3 day courses where students are engaged in immersive, hands-on, applied learning. We call a lot of what we do “simulations” even though this generally means different things to different people. We try and simulate real life events (train derailments, burning buildings, mass casualty events) with or without technology, and have students immersed in these events to apply their learning. We have an entire campus dedicated to burning things and putting out fires, in addition to a car race track, and at our main campus we have a fake courtroom, fake apartment building, and a building dedicated to scenario-based learning. Oh, and (unusually for Canadian post secondaries) a gun range in the basement.
Interestingly, about 30% of what we do is online (for a variety of different reasons that I won’t get into here). Our students are highly dispersed geographically, largely considered adult learners, and generally have an ongoing, lifelong learning relationship with our institution. They come from professions that aren’t the sit-at-your-desk variety, which I label as mobile. You may see where I’m going with all this, but let me elaborate a bit further.
- For the most part, we don’t operate and design for a 3 credit, online course paradigm. This is what LMS’s do quite well.
- We need a variety of tools that are well suited for short, micro moments of learning. We’ve found that WordPress is really good at this.
- A growing percentage of our courses are open, which we’ve found works best in open tools like WordPress.
- We are a small budget institution with a need for a variety of ed tech tools, but not the ones that come with LMS’s – your latest eportfolio tool is not a sell. And blowing our entire ed tech budget on a do-everything LMS is not our chosen strategy.
- As a small budget institution, we need creative solutions to creating a non-resource intensive ed tech infrastructure. More on that over here courtesy of @clintlalonde.
- Our mobile needs are not met by simply app-ifying the LMS. Our context for and view of mobile learning is very different (more on that here).
- There are no ed tech tools (LMS or other) that are designed for synchronous online scenario-based learning. We created our own, and it is a core learning technology that is in the process of being commercialized.
So what can an LMS company do? Well, the last time we had a vendor here, we took them on a tour of our applied learning spaces. They showed interest but didn’t take notes even though we tried to drop them some clues as to where the dev group might want to put their heads. For starters, I would suggest a well informed brainstorming session on applied learning – what does it look like, what do people do in it, what is the use context? Then perhaps a session that seriously unpacks what a course is or needs to be in that context. Then I would take a group around to community colleges and vocational institutes that are doing some form of distance learning because you will probably find that they are doing some interesting and creative things with technology and program design. Then perhaps go back to the drawing board and collaborate with some institutions on solving their problems before you try and sell them an out of the box package. Case in point…if you had showed up at our doors 5 years ago with a synchronous, scenario-based online learning took, we would have taken a serious look at it and not bothered developing our own. Or, if you had partnered with us in developing it, we would have found a mutually beneficial relationship.
Thanks for listening…I look forward to seeing where you go in the future.